EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HIGH-RISK HPV GENOTYPES AND THEIR CLINICAL CORRELATES WITH CERVICAL CYTOLOGY IN EASTERN BULGARIA: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Authors

  • E. Ismail Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University – Varna Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8415-8424
  • P. Dobrev Burgas State University ”Prof. Asen Zlatarov” Author
  • D. Paychu Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University – Varna; SHOGAT ”Prof. Dimitar Stamatov” – Varna Author

Keywords:

cervical cytology, abnormal cervical cytology, PAP smear test, HPV screening, high-risk HPV genotypes

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) remains a major public health problem, ranking as the fourth most common malignancy among women worldwide. Persistent infection with high-risk (HR) human papillomavirus (HPV) (HR-HPV) genotypes is the principal etiological factor in the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical carcinoma. More than 200 HPV genotypes have been identified, of which at least 13 are classified as HR (highly oncogenic). HPV 16 and 18 alone account for approximately 70% of the CC cases globally. The prevalence and distribution of HPV genotypes vary substantially by geographic region, age, socioeconomic factors, and screening practices. Regional characterization of HPV epidemiology is therefore essential for tailoring vaccination programs, screening strategies, and follow up guidelines. Objective: To evaluate the frequency and association between HR-HPV infection and cervical cytological abnormalities and to describe HPV genotype distribution in a screened population. Materials and Methods: The retrospective analysis included 190 women aged 15-60 years who underwent routine CC screening. Patients with incomplete medical records or a history of treatment for CIN were excluded. All the patients underwent liquid-based cytology and HPV genotyping (only HR oncogenic HPV strains were tested; patients with low risk HPV types were not included).  Results: Of the 190 patients included in the study, 65 tested positive for HPV, yielding an overall infection rate of 34.2%. Our analysis found that the number of patients tested for HPV increased over the years: from 22 tests in 2022 to 58 in 2025. Among 190 patients, 125 (65.8%) were HPV-negative and 65 (34.2%) HPV-positive. The rate of abnormal cytology was 26.32% (50/190), and the overall prevalence of HR-HPV positivity was 34.2% (65/190). In our cohort, of the 50 patients with abnormal cytology, 38 were HR-HPV-positive, while among 140 patients with normal cytology, 113 were HR-HPV-negative. The HR-HPV types detected in our cohort were mainly 16, 66, 45, 51, 52 and 53. The frequency distribution was as follows: HPV 16 – 10% (19/190), 66 – 4.74% (9/190), 45 – 4.74% (9/190), 52 – 4.21% (8/190), and HPV 51 and 53 – 3.68% (7/190) each. Of the 65 HPV-positive patients, 61.54% (40/65) had a single HR-HPV type infection and 38.46% (25/65) had multiple HR-HPV infections. In the 20-29-year age group, two patients were positive for five different HR-HPV types. A chi-square test was used to assess the association between single and multiple infections. Multiple infections were recorded when more than one HR-HPV genotype was detected in the sample. Conclusion: The present study confirms a strong association between HPV infection and abnormal cervical cytology, supporting the established role of HPV as a major factor in the development of CIN. Women with a positive HPV result had a six-fold increased risk of cytological abnormalities, consistent with findings from global meta-analyses. Based on the analysis of HR-HPV infection in exfoliated cervical cells from 190 gynecological patients in our clinic in Eastern Bulgaria, we draw the following conclusions: from 2022 to 2025, the overall prevalence of HR-HPV infections showed an increasing trend. Rates of single and multiple HR-HPV infections peaked among young women. Single infections remain the predominant form of HPV infection, with the most common HR genotypes being HPV 16, 66, 45, 52, 53 and 51. HR-HPV type 33, which is included in current HPV vaccines, was not detected in the studied population. In our study, HR-HPV-positive women were 6.5 times more likely to have abnormal cervical cytology.

References

Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J et al. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):890-907. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61416-0.

Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999 Sep;189(1):12-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F.

Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. Chapter 1: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer--burden and assessment of causality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2003;(31):3-13. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003479.

Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué M et al. Cervical Human Papillomavirus Prevalence in 5 Continents: Meta-Analysis of 1 Million Women with Normal Cytological Findings. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2010, 202, (12), 1789-1799. https://doi.org/10.1086/657321

de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L et al. Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1048-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M et al. Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2003 Jan 13;88(1):63-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600688.

Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S et al. International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 6;348(6):518-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021641.

Rampuria S, Chandwaskar N. J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2023;12(7):2113-2118.

Ahmed HG et al. Prevalence of HPV subtypes 16 and 18 among Yemeni patients with cervical cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18:1543-1548.

Manini I, Montomoli E. Epidemiology and prevention of human papillomavirus. Ann Ig. 2018;30(4 Suppl 1):28-32.

Peirson L et al. Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013;2(35):1-14.

Koutsky LA et al. A cohort study of CIN 2-3 in relation to HPV infection. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(18):1272-1278.

Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A et al. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X

Zhao Y, Bao H, Ma L et al. Real-world effectiveness of primary screening with high-risk human papillomavirus testing in the cervical cancer screening programme in China: a nationwide, population-based study. BMC Med. 2021;19:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02026-0.

Gavinski K, DiNardo D. Cervical cancer screening. Medical Clinics of North America. 2023, 107, (2), 259-269.

Mayrand MH et al. HPV DNA versus Pap screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(16):1579-1588.

Solomon D et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287:2114-2119.

Ferris DG et al. Colposcopic accuracy and reliability: evaluation of the Reid Colposcopic Index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:1057-1061.

Reid R, Scalzi P. Genital warts and cervical cancer: an improved colposcopic index for differentiating benign from precancerous lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:278-284.

WHO. WHO Guideline for Screening and Treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention, second edition: web annex A: syntheses of evidence. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2021.

Cancer IAfRo. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. WHO; 2012, p. 499.

Wang R, Pan W, Jin L et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine against cervical cancer: opportunity and challenge. Cancer Lett. 2020;471:88-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.039

Beyazit F, Sılan F, Gencer M et al. The prevelance of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes detected by PCR in women with normal and abnormal cervico-vaginal cytology. Ginekol Pol. 2018;89(2):62-67. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0011.

Saeed NK, Alshaikh S, Al-Beltagi M. Comparative study of pap smear and polymerase chain reaction tests for human papillomavirus screening in Bahrain. East Mediterr Health J. 2025 Aug 3;31(7):453-462. doi: 10.26719/2025.31.7.453.

Chen X, Xu H, Xu W et al. Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus in 961,029 screening tests in southeastern China (Zhejiang Province) between 2011 and 2015. Sci Rep, 2017, 7, 14813. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13299-y

Kiguradze E, Skhirtladze T, Chkhartishvili N et al. Comparison of cervical cancer screening models based on Pap and HPV tests in Tbilisi, Georgia. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2024 Sep;32(3):166-172. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a8014.

Sargent A, Fletcher S, Bray K et al. Cross-sectional study of HPV testing in self-sampled urine and comparison with matched vaginal and cervical samples in women attending colposcopy for the management of abnormal cervical screening. BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 29;9(4):e025388. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025388.

Trottier H, Franco EL. The epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus infection. Vaccine. 2006 Mar 30;24 Suppl 1:S1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.09.054.

Meštrović T, Ljubin-Sternak S, Božičević I et al. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Prevalence, Temporal Dynamics and Association with Abnormal Cervical Cytology Findings in Women from Croatia: Is there a Compounding Effect of Low-Risk/High-Risk HPV Co-Infection? Clin Lab. 2020 Dec 1;66(12). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200406.

Ngu SF, Cheung ANY, Jong KK et al. 2024 Hong Kong College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Guidelines for cervical cancer prevention and screening. Hong Kong Med J. 2024 Dec;30(6):488-497. doi: 10.12809/hkmj2411547. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

Perkins RB et al. 2020 ASCCP risk-based management consensus guidelines. J Low Genit Tract Dis.2020;24(2):102-131.

Bhatla N, Singhal S. Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 May;65:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

https://plusmen.bg/bg/national-programs/hpv

Downloads

Published

05.08.2026

Issue

Section

Original articles

How to Cite

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF HIGH-RISK HPV GENOTYPES AND THEIR CLINICAL CORRELATES WITH CERVICAL CYTOLOGY IN EASTERN BULGARIA: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY (E. . Ismail, P. . Dobrev, & D. . Paychu , Trans.). (2026). General Medicine, 28(4), 21-27. https://journals.mu-sofia.bg/index.php/gm/article/view/1062

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.