Minimally invasive regenerative treatment of vertical bone defects: a clinical trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/AMB-2025-0073Keywords:
vertical bone defects, periodontal regeneration, minimally invasive surgical treatment, enamel matrix derivativesAbstract
The aim of the current study was to analyze and evaluate the outcomes of regenerative therapy using a bone graft and enamel matrix proteins, applied through a minimally invasive surgical approach for the treatment of vertical bone defects. Materials and methods: Ten systemically healthy patients with a total of 30 vertical bone defects were treated using a minimally invasive surgical approach combining enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) with a bone graft. Probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and radiographic defect depth were analyzed before and at the 6-month postoperative follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and the paired Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). Results: At the 6-month follow-up, a statistically significant reduction in probing pocket depth (mean reduction: 4.00 ± 1.44 mm; p < 0.0001) and a significant gain in clinical attachment level (mean gain: 4.62 ± 2.13 mm; p < 0.0001) were recorded. Radiographic evaluation also revealed a statistically significant reduction in bone defect depth (mean change: 2.95 ± 1.34 mm; p = 0.0027), with a residual mean depth of 0.57 ± 0.73 mm. Conclusion: The minimally invasive approach using enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) in combination with bone grafting proved effective in the treatment of vertical bone defects. The favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes suggest periodontal stability and support the long-term preservation of the treated teeth.
References
Kotsilkov K, Popova C, Boyanova L et al. Comparison of culture method and real-time PCR for detection of putative periodontopathogenic bacteria in deep periodontal pockets. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2015; 29(5):996–1002.
Kotsilkov K. Modified coronally advanced flap approach with isthmus deepithelialization for the treatment of multiple recession defects in cases with interdental tissue loss. J of IMAB. 2021;27(2):3784- 3792.
Pilloni A, Zeza B, Kuis D, et al. Treatment of residual periodontal pockets using a hyaluronic Acid-Based gel: a 12-month multicenter randomized Triple-Blinded clinical trial. Antibiotics. 2021;10(8):924.
Dimova-Gabrovska MI, Maksimovskaya LN, Dimitrova DG. Changes in the oral mucosa in patients with bruxism. Stomatology. 2021;100(6):48.
Dimova-Gabrovska M, Dimitrova D. Study of the dietary minerals intake of children with early childhood caries. Archives of the Balkan Medical Union, 2019; 54(3):540-548.
Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, et al. Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S162-70.
Dimova-Gabrovska M, Shopova D, Stamenova M. Oral Clinical Manifestations in Patients with COVID-19: A Review. Acta Medica Bulgarica. 2024;51(s2):188–94.
Kotsilkov K, Popova C. Effectiveness of target antimicrobial therapy of severe chronic periodontitis. Part III: clinical аtachment gain. J IMAB. 2010;16(4):24–26.
Kotsilkov K, Popova C. Real-time PCR identification for target adjunctive antibiotic therapy of severe chronic periodontitis. Part II – microbiological efficacy. J IMAB. 2014;20(5):610–616.
Maynalovska H, Mlachkova A, Kotsilkov K.Comparative analysis of microorganisms around teeth and implants in health and disease. J of IMAB. 2025;31(1):6004-6008.
Sanz M, Herrera D, Kebschull M, et al. Treatment of stage III periodontitis EFP S3 level clinical practice guideline. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47 (Suppl 22):4–60.
Matuliene G, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, et al. Influence of residual pockets on progression of periodontitis and tooth loss: Results after 11 years of maintenance. J Clinic Periodontology. 2008;35(8):685–95.
Kotsilkov K, Popova C, Dosseva V. Effectiveness of target antimicrobial therapy of severe chronic periodontitis part I: Reduction of gingival inflammation and active periodontal disease sites. J IMAB, 2010; 16:18-20.
Kotsilkov K, Dimitrov R. Complex treatment in a patient with severe chronic periodontitis (Case Report). J of IMAB. 2015;21(1):687-689.
Dimova-Gabrovska M, Stamenova M, Shopova D, Yankova M. The modern digital intraoral scanning systems: a review. Acta Medica Bulgarica. 2024; 51(2):58-64.
Dimova M, Svechtarov V. Quantitative Assessment of Pterygomasseteric Hypertrophy. Folia medica. 2003, 45(4):56-58.
Dimitrova D, Dimova-Gabrovska M, Maksimovskaya L. Aesthetic crowns in primary teeth – a new methodology for evaluating the preventive value. Comptes rendus de l’Académie bulgare des Sciences, 2021;74(2):300-308.
Polimeni G, Xiropaidis AV, Wikesjö UME. Biology and principles of periodontal wound healing/regeneration. Periodontology 2000. 2006;41(1):30–47.
Bosshardt DD. Biological mediators and periodontal regeneration: a review of enamel matrix proteins at the cellular and molecular levels. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):87–105.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Papanikolaou N, et al. Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2(4):247–66.
Sculean A, Windisch P, Szendröi-Kiss D, et al. Clinical and Histologic Evaluation of an Enamel Matrix Derivative Combined With a Biphasic Calcium Phosphate for the Treatment of Human Intrabony Periodontal Defects. Journal of Periodontology. 2008; 79(10):1991–9.
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Rasperini G, et al. Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of tissue engineering strategies for periodontal and peri-implant reconstruction. Periodontology 2000. 2023;91(1):217–69.
Trombelli L, Farina R, Franceschetti G, et al. Single-Flap Approach with Buccal Access in Periodontal Reconstructive Procedures. Journal of Periodontology. 2009;80(2):353–60.
Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: a novel approach to limit morbidity. J Clinic Periodontology. 2007;34(1):87–93.
Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intra-bony defects. I: clinical outcomes and morbidity. J Clinic Periodontology. 2007;34(12):1082–8.
Cortellini P, Pini-Prato G, Nieri M, et al. Minimally invasive surgical technique and enamel matrix derivative in intrabony defects: 2. Factors associated with healing outcomes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009;29(3):257–65.
Trombelli L, Simonelli A, Quaranta A, et al. Effect of Flap Design for Enamel Matrix Derivative Application in Intraosseous Defects. JDR Clinical & Translational Research. 2021;6(2):184–94.
Aimetti M, Fratini A, Manavella V, et al. Pocket resolution in regenerative treatment of intrabony defects with papilla preservation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Clinic Periodontology. 2021;48(6):843–58.
Simonelli A, Severi M, Trombelli L, et al. Minimal invasiveness in the surgical treatment of intraosseous defects: A systematic review. Periodontology 2000. 2023;91(1):20–44.
Saleh MHA, Mallala D, Alrmali A, et al. Residual vertical defects: risk of disease progression, retreatment rates, and cost: a retrospective analysis. Clin Oral Invest. 2024;28(8):446.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 K. Kotsilkov, V. Dosseva-Panova, Z. Pashova-Tasseva, H. Maynalovska (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under these terms.
Journal Acta Medica Bulgarica 
