Apical conical size of the root lengths: an anatomical comparative study of significance to minimally invasive endodontics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/AMB-2026-0004Keywords:
apical patency, apical size, endodontic anatomy, minimally invasive endodonticsAbstract
Abstract. Introduction: The apical thirds of the roots and their cone-shaped parts are neglected into dental literature and education. Apical foramen is the only anatomical structure in the internal part of the root conus with construction described in textbooks, atlases and monographs. Aim: The aim of the study is to measure the size and proportion of the longitudinal part of the conic shape of the roots into different groups of teeth for maximum saving of dentine and sound active root surface for prevention of fractures and cracks. Materials and Methods: 158 upper and lower front teeth are included in the study. Lengths were measured twice for each tooth with endodontic files and disks as follows: the whole tooth, the root from neck to apex and the conical part of the root. Exclusion criteria consisted of: teeth with broken cusps, roots, or incisal ridges, large apical resorptions higher than 1.5 mm, fluorotic teeth, teeth with abrasion, and lateral root resorptions larger than 1 mm. Results: The null hypothesis for a smaller deviation of the length of the cone part from the roots compared with the whole root in the total longitudinal size of the roots was proved. This cone part was measured to be between 4.3-6.3 mm distance from the apex in upper and lower front teeth and premolars. The proportion to the whole length of the roots varies from 25% to 48.8% (p<0.05). The statistics were performed with the more sensible Levene’s test for mean differences. Conclusions: Active rotary machine root canal preparations in the apical zone, even at 1-2 mm away from the apex can decrease significantly the amount of apical dentine and can lead to cracks in this area. Bigger sizes of posts can overload the roots in this zone and their safe placement is essential.
References
Boteva E. Endodontics. Lectures, atlas and research articles. Sofia, Аrbilis, 2014, 128-131, 153-155, 189-193.
Boyanov B, Avramov D, Karyovski S, et al. Results from a measurement on sizes of teeth. Stomatologia, 1951, 2:101-111.
Krayovski S, Hristozov T. A manual for practices of preclinics of prosthetic dentistry. Sofia, Meditsina i fizkultura, 1958.
Gusiiska A. Endodontic approaches in the treatment of periapical lesions. Dissertation, Sofia, Direct Services, 2015.
Karova E. Base of modern endodontics. Sofia, Valdeks, 2019.
Mironova J. Efficiency of different techniques for removal of intracanal medication. Dissertation, Sofia, Medical University, 2014.
Ruskov R, Likov Ch, Evtimov E. A manual for practices of preclinics of prosthetic dentistry. Sofia, Meditsina I fizkultura, 1968, 6-8, 10, 11.
Ruskov R, Likov Ch, Evtimov E. A manual for practices of preclinics of prosthetic dentistry. Sofia, Meditsina I fizkultura, 1972, 6-8, 10, 11.
Ruskov R, Likov Ch, Evtimov E. A manual for practices of preclinics of prosthetic dentistry. Sofia, Meditsina I fizkultura, 1976, 6-8, 10, 11, 13.
Ruskov R, Likov Ch, Evtimov E. A manual for practices of preclinics of prosthetic dentistry. Sofia, Meditsina I fizkultura, 1982, 6-8, 12.
Tzenova I. Structural integrity of root dentin during endodontic treatment. Dissertation Medical University, Sofia, 2020.
Tzolova Е. New endodontic approaches in conditioning of root dentin for 3D obturation. Dissertation, Sofia, Medical University, 2019.
De Chevigny C, et al. Treatment outcome in endodontics. The Toronto study – phases 3 and 4. JOE, 2008, 34(2), 130-137.
Eleftheriadis G, Lambrianidis Т. Technical quality of root canal treatment and detection of iatrogenic errors in an undergraduate dental clinic. Int Endod J, 2005, 38(10), 725-734.
Glickman G, et al. The crisis in endodontic education: current perspectives and strategies for change. JOE, 2005, 31(4), 225-261.
Hayes S, et al. An audit of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students. Int Endod J, 2001, 34(7), 501-505.
Ingle JI, Backland L. Endodontics. 4th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1994, 322-323, 485-493.
Messing JJ, Stock CR. A colour atlas of Endodontics. Wolfe Medical Publications, 1988, 119-120, 124-132, 122, 201.
Norton N. Netter’s Head and Neck Anatomy for Dentistry. Elsevier/Saunders, 2016.
Olgart L, Bergenholtz G. The dentin-pulp complex: structures, functions and responses to adverse influences. In: Textbook of Endodontology. Bergenholtz G, Hørsted-Bindslev P, Reit C. (Eds), Wiley Blackwell, Oxford, 2010, 11-30.
Qualtrough A, Withworth JM, Dummer P. Preclinical endodontology: an international comparison. Int Endod J, 1999, 32(5):406-414.
Scheid R, Weiss G. Woelfel’s Dental Anatomy. 9th ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2020.
Stock C, et al. Colour Atlas and Text of Endodontics. Mosby-Wolfe 1995, 89.
Do T, Yang M, Kim JR. Prevalence of Teaching Apical Patency and Various Instrumentation and Obturation Techniques in US Dental Schools. Two decades later. JOE, 2023, 49(9):1099-1105.
Torabinejad M, Walton R. Endodontics. Principles and practice. Elsevier, 2002, 5, 218, 222-227.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 E. Boteva, S. Yantscheva (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under these terms.
Journal Acta Medica Bulgarica