Decentralized clinical trials – current environment, potential barriers and facilitators for implementation and risk mitigation: а review of the literature

Authors

  • M. Dimitrova Department “Organization and Economics of Pharmacy”, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • R. Hristov Department “Organization and Economics of Pharmacy”, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • A. Djemadan Department “Organization and Economics of Pharmacy”, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria Author
  • I. Gaytandzieva Department “Organization and Economics of Pharmacy”, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University – Sofia, Bulgaria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/AMB-2023-0047

Keywords:

decentralized clinical trials, digital transformation, patient access, challenges

Abstract

Introduction: Decentralized clinical trials are a new approach in health technology research and development that take advantage of innovative digital technologies in data collection for clinical trial purposes. Decentralized clinical trials achieve shorter participant recruitment periods, better adherence to assigned therapy, lower drop-out rates and shorter trial duration overall. Participants reported greater convenience compared to traditional clinical trials due to the studies being conducted at home and the removal of transport and time barriers. 
Materials and methods: A literature review was conducted using the Scoping Review methodology defined by Arskey and O'Malley in 2005 and further updated in 2010 and 2014. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar scientific databases were searched using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and keywords: virtual clinical trials, and/or decentralized clinical trials and barriers and challenges. 
Results: The literature review found 40 articles that met the specifi ed inclusion and exclusion criteria. The results of the diff erent studies in this area show that decentralized clinical trials achieve shorter recruitment periods, better adherence to assigned therapy, lower dropout rates from trials, and shorter trial duration overall. Participants reported greater convenience compared to traditional clinical trials due to the studies being conducted at home and the removal of transport and time barriers. Major challenges with this type of trial is the diffi culty in conducting physical examinations, invasive therapies by the investigators, and privacy protection. 
Conclusion: The adoption of a regulatory framework for digital healthcare, education of medical professionals and patients about innovative technologies are necessary, especially in countries from Central and Eastern Europe.

References

Khozin S, Coravos A. Decentralized trials in the age of realworld evidence and inclusivity in clinical investigations. Clin Pharm & Therapeutics 2019; DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1441.

Apostolaros M, Babaian D, Corneli A et al. Legal, regulatory, and practical issues to consider when adopting decentralized clinical trials: Recommendations from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science 2020; 54:779-787.

Thomas L, Capistrant G. 50 State telemedicine gaps analysis: physician practice standards and licensure. Washington DC: American Telemedicine Association; 2017.

Center for Connected Health Policy. State Telehealth Laws and Reimbursement Policies: a comprehensive scan of the 50 states and the district of Columbia. Public Health Institute; 2018.

Cwiklicki M, Schiavone F, Klich J et al. Antecedents of use of e-health services in Central Eastern Europe: a qualitative comparative analysis. BMC Health Services Research 2020; 20; 171.

Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 2014, 5(4) Available at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jrsm.1123/pdf (Accessed 20th August 2021).

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework, International Journal of Social Research Methodology; 2005, 8(1):19-32.

Levac D, Colquhoun H, and O’Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 2010, 5(1):69 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.

COVID-19 and clinical trials: The Medidata perspective, Medidata Solutions, May 4, 2020, medidata.com.

McKinsey & Company. No place like home? Stepping up the decentralization of clinical trials. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/life-sciences/our-insights/no-placelike-home-stepping-up-the-decentralization-of-clinical-trials. Accessed on: November 2021

Zarka A et al. Virtual clinical trials: Perspectives in Dermatology. Dermatology 2020; 236; 375-382. DOI:10.1159/000506418

Apostolaros M et al. Legal, Regulatory, and Practical Issues to Consider When Adopting Decentralized Clinical Trials: Recommendations From the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Ther Innov Regul Sci . 2020 Jul;54(4):779-787. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00006-4.

Van Norman GA. Decentralized Clinical Trials.The Future of Medical Product Development? JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 27;6(4):384-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.01.011

Krishna S. Gunturu et al. Clinical Trials in the Era of Digital Engagement: A SWOG Call to Action. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020 Mar;4:254-258. doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00128

Yu Zhuang et al. Applying Blockchain Technology for Health Information Exchange and Persistent Monitoring for Clinical Trials. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Dec 5;2018:1167-1175.

De Brouwer W et al. Empowering clinical research in a decentralized world. NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Jul 1;4(1):102. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00473-w.

Sundquist S, Batist G, Brodeur-Robb K, et al. CRAFT-A Proposed Framework for Decentralized Clinical Trials Participation in Canada. Curr Oncol. 2021 Sep 30;28(5):3857-3865. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050329.

Tan AC et al. Adapting to a Pandemic - Conducting Oncology Trials during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic 2020. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jul 1;26(13):3100-3103. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1364.

Haak D et al. DICOM for Clinical Research: PACS-Integrated Electronic Data Capture in Multi-Center Trials. J Digit Imaging. 2015 Oct;28(5):558-66. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9802-8.

Lehrach H. Virtual Clinical Trials, an Essential Step in Increasing the Eff ectiveness of the Drug Development Process. Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(6):366-71. doi: 10.1159/000441553.

Sommer C, Zuccolin D, Arnera V, Schmitz N, Adolfsson P, Colombo N, Gilg R, McDowell B. Building clinical trials around patients: Evaluation and comparison of decentralized and conventional site models in patients with low back pain. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Jun 28;11:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.008.

Dorsey ER et al. The triple aim of clinical research. Clin Trials. 2021;18(4):511-513. doi: 10.1177/17407745211001522

Spertus JA et al. Novel Trial Design: CHIEF-HF. Circ Heart Fail. 2021;14(3):e007767. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE. 120.007767

Lee EQ et al. Report of National Brain Tumor Society roundtable workshop on innovating brain tumor clinical trials: building on lessons learned from COVID-19 experience. Neuro Oncol. 2021 Aug 2;23(8):1252-1260. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab082

Gouda P et al. Feasibility of Incorporating Voice Technology and Virtual Assistants in Cardiovascular Care and Clinical Trials. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2021;15(8):13. doi: 10.1007/s12170-021-00673-9

Persky S. A Virtual Home for the Virtual Clinical Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 3;22(1):e15582. doi: 10.2196/15582

Hashem H et al. Obstacles and Considerations Related to Clinical Trial Research During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 23;7:598038. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.598038

McGoohan K et al. A Preliminary Investigation of the Views of People With Parkinson’s (With and Without Psychosis) and Caregivers on Participating in Clinical Trials During the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Online Survey. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 23;11:602480. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.602480.

Ali Z et al. High adherence and low dropout rate in a virtual clinical study of atopic dermatitis through weekly rewardbased personalized genetic lifestyle reports. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235500.

Yaakov RA et al. Enhancing Patient Centricity and Advancing Innovation in Clinical Research with Virtual Randomized Clinical Trials (vRCTs). Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 21;11(2):151. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020151

Wang H et al. Conducting a Virtual Clinical Trial in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Using a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Model With an Epigenetic Modulator and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Feb 25;8:141. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00141.

Kadakia KT et al. Virtual Clinical Trials in Oncology-Overview, Challenges, Policy Considerations, and Future Directions. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Apr;5:421-425. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00169.

Yan Zhuang et al. Development of A Blockchain Framework for Virtual Clinical Trials. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:1412-1420.

Ieronimakis KM et al. Leveraging Tele-Critical Care Capabilities for Clinical Trial Consent. Crit Care Explor. 2020;2(7):e0167. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000167

Schneider RB et al. Design of a virtual longitudinal observational study in Parkinson’s disease (AT-HOME PD). Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2021 Feb;8(2):308-320. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51236.

Marra C et al. Use of connected digital products in clinical research following the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 22;11(6):e047341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047341.

Getz K et al. Assessing the Scope and Predictors of Intentional Dose Non-adherence in Clinical Trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1330-1338. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00155-x.

Vinay Singh et al. COVID-19 and Clinical Trials: Current Challenges and Future Directions. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2021;16(3):258-261. doi: 10.2174/1574887116666210122160705.

Coert RMH, Timmis JK, Boorsma A, Pasman WJ. Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 6;23(7):e26813. doi: 10.2196/2681

Samei E et al. Virtual Clinical Trials: Why and What (Special Section Guest Editorial). J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Jul;7(4):042801. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.042801.

Chiamulera C, Mantovani E, Tamburin S. Remote clinical trials: A timely opportunity for a virtual reality approach and its potential application in neurology. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Oct;87(10):3639-3642. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14922

Petrini C, Mannelli C, Riva L, et al. Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs): A few ethical considerations. Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 15;10:1081150. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1081150

Goodson N, Wicks P, Morgan J, Hashem L, Callinan S, Reites J. Opportunities and counterintuitive challenges for decentralized clinical trials to broaden participant inclusion. NPJ Digit Med. 2022 May 5;5(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00603-y

Coyle J, Rogers A, Copland R, et al. Trials@Home Consortium. A secondary qualitative analysis of stakeholder views about participant recruitment, retention, and adherence in decentralised clinical trials (DCTs). Trials. 2022 Jul 30;23(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06521-4.

Adams DV, Long S, Fleury ME. Association of Remote Technology Use and Other Decentralization Tools With Patient Likelihood to Enroll in Cancer Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen. 2022.20053

Moore J, Goodson N, Wicks P, Reites J. What role can decentralized trial designs play to improve rare disease studies? Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 20;17(1):240. doi:10.1186/s13023-022-02388-5

Rogers A, De Paoli G, Subbarayan S, et al. Trials@Home Consortium. A systematic review of methods used to conduct decentralised clinical trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;88(6):2843-2862. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15205.

De Las Heras B, Daehnke A, Saini KS, et al. Role of decentralized clinical trials in cancer drug development: Results from a survey of oncologists and patients. Digit Health. 2022 May 25;8:20552076221099997. doi:10.1177/20552076221099997.

DiMasi JA, Smith Z, Oakley-Girvan I, et al. Assessing the Financial Value of Decentralized Clinical Trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Mar;57(2):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00454-5

De Jong A, van Rijssel T, Zuidgeest M et al. Opportunities and challenges for decentralized clinical trials: European Regulators Perspective. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2022; 112 (2):344-352. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2628

Downloads

Published

15.12.2023

Issue

Section

SCIENTIFIC REVIEW

How to Cite

Dimitrova, M., Hristov, R., Djemadan, A., & Gaytandzieva, I. (2023). Decentralized clinical trials – current environment, potential barriers and facilitators for implementation and risk mitigation: а review of the literature. Acta Medica Bulgarica, 50(4), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.2478/AMB-2023-0047