Pharmacogenomic approach to decision-making in polypharmacy

Authors

  • H. Krastev Health Technology Assessment, Ltd, Sofia Author
  • S. Tsankov Regional Pharmaceutical Collegium Sofia-Capital Author
  • Т. Vekov Bulgarian Cardiac Institute Author

Keywords:

polypharmacy, harmful drug–drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, pharmacogenomic approach

Abstract

Polypharmacy is an increasingly prevalent iatrogenic condition driven both by medical necessity and by external pressure from the pharmaceutical industry and/or patients. Although its primary aim is to improve patients’ quality of life and life expectancy, unnecessary or inappropriate medication use may lead to significant adverse outcomes. Patients subjected to polypharmacy are at a substantially increased risk of adverse drug reactions and harmful drug–drug interactions, which may result in hospitalization, prolonged hospital stay, and increased morbidity and mortality. These adverse outcomes impose a considerable economic burden on both patients and healthcare institutions, contributing to the inefficient use of already limited healthcare resources. Therefore, there is a clear need to identify effective solutions. The present review of the literature provides evidence that pharmacogenomic testing may reduce both the risks associated with polypharmacy and some of the related healthcare costs. Nevertheless, it remains underutilized in routine clinical practice. Pharmacogenomic testing represents a logical and evidence-based approach to the management of polypharmacy, with the potential to reduce both its economic burden and its associated adverse effects.

References

Barto T. Which drugs should be deprescribed in the elderly? Med Scape, 2015, https://www.medscape.com

Maher R, Hanlon J, Hajjar E. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2014, 13(1), 57–65.

Lipton H, Bird J. The impact of clinical pharmacists’ consultations on geriatric patients’ compliance and medical care use: A randomized controlled trial. Gerontologist, 1994, 34(3), 307–315.

Swinglehurst D, Fudge N. The polypharmacy challenge: time for a new script? Br J Gen Pract, 2017, 67(662), 388–389.

Quinn K, Shah N. A dataset quantifying polypharmacy in the United States. Sci Data, 2017, 4, e170167.

Vu T, Finch C, Day L, et al. Patterns of comorbidity in community-dwelling older people hospitalised for fall-related injury: A cluster analysis. BMC Geriatr, 2011, 11, 45.

FDA. Guidance for Industry: Consumer-Direct Broadcast Advertisements, 1999, www.fda.gov

Kornfield R, Donohue J, Berndt E, et al. Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers and providers, 2001–2010. PLoS One, 2013, 8(3), e55504.

Trusts P. Persuading the prescribers: Pharmaceutical industry marketing and its influence on physicians and patients. 2013, www.pewtrusts.org

Gilbody S, Wilson P, Watt I. Benefits and harms of direct to consumer advertising: A systematic review. Qual Saf Health

FDA. Office of prescription drug promotion (OPDP) research, 2014, www.fda.gov

Alexander G, Kruszewski S, Webster D. Rethinking opioid prescribing to protect patient safety and public health. JAMA, 2012, 308(18), 1865–1866.

Fain K, Alexander G. Mind the gap: understanding the effect of pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising. Med Care, 2014, 52(4), 291–293.

Radcliff S, Yue J, Rocco G, et al. American Geriatrics Society 2015 updated Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2015, 63(11), 2227–2246.

Steinman M, Fick D. Using Wisely: A reminder on the proper use of the American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2019, 67(4), 644–646.

Muth C, Blom J, Smith S, et al. Evidence supporting the best clinical management of patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: A systematic guideline review and expert consensus. J Intern Med, 2019, 285(3), 272–288.

Finkelstein J, Friedman C, Hripcsak G, et al. Pharmacogenetic polymorphism as an independent risk factor for frequent hospitalizations in older adults with polypharmacy: A pilot study. Pharmacogenomics Pers Med, 2016, 9, 107–116.

Isidoro-Garcia M, Sanchez-Martin A, Garcia-Berrocal B, et al. Primun non nocere polypharmacy and pharmacogenetics. Pharmacogenomics, 2015, 16(17), 1903–1905.

Salvidar J, Taylor D, Sugarman E, et al. Initial assessment of the benefits of implementing pharmacogenomics into the medical management of patients in a long-term care facility. Pharmacogenomics Pers Med, 2016, 9(1), 1–6.

Mayhew M, Jablоnski M, Li J, et al. Combinatorial pharmacogenomics reduces polypharmacy and medication cost in elderly patients with anxiety and depression. AAGP Annual Meeting, 2017.

Verbelen M, Weale M, Lewic C. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment: Are we there yet? Pharmacogenomics, 2017, 17(5), 395–402.

Johnson S, Gruntowicz D, Chua T, et al. Financial analysis of CYP2C19 genotyping in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy following acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Manag Care Spec Pharm, 2015, 21(7), 552–557.

Johnson J, Humma L. Pharmacogenetics of cardiovascular drugs. Brief Funct Genomics Proteomics, 2002, 1(1), 66–79.

Brixner D, Biltaji E, Bress A, et al. The effect of pharmacogenetic profiling with a clinical decision support tool on healthcare resource utilization and estimated costs in the elderly exposed to polypharmacy. J Med Econ, 2016, 19(3), 213–228.

Haga S, Allen N, Moaddeb J. Challenges to integrating pharmacogenetic testing into medication therapy management. J Manag Care Spec Pharm, 2015, 21(4), 346–352.

De Leon J, Spina E. What is needed to incorporate clinical pharmacogenetic tests into the practice of psychopharmacotherapy? Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol, 2016, 9(3), 351–354.

Rahmner P, Elermann B, Korkmaz S, et al. Physicians reported needs of drug information at point of care in Sweden. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2012, 73(1), 115–125.

Van der Wouden C, Bank P, Ozokcu K, et al. Pharmacist initiated pre-emptive pharmacogenetic panel testing with clinical decision support in primary care: Record of PGx results and real-world impact. Genes (Basel), 2019, 10, 6.

Sim S, Altman R, Ingelman-Sundberg M. Databases in the area of pharmacogenetics. Hum Mutat, 2011, 32(5), 526–531.

PharmADME. 2019, http://www.pharmaadme.org/joomla

The Drug Gene Interaction Database. 2019, www.dgibd.org

Whirl-Carrillo M, McDonagh E, Hebert J, et al. Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2012, 92(4), 414–417.

Rosenblat J, Lee Y, McIntyre R, Does pharmacogenomic testing improve clinical outcomes for major depressive disorder? A systematic review of clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies. J Clin Psychiatry, 2017, 78(6), 720–729.

Published

03.09.2026

Issue

Section

Scientific reviews

How to Cite

Krastev, H., Tsankov, S., & Vekov Т. (2026). Pharmacogenomic approach to decision-making in polypharmacy. Medical Review, 62(5), 12-19. https://journals.mu-sofia.bg/index.php/mr/article/view/1130