The modern digital intraoral scanning systems: a review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/AMB-2024-0021Keywords:
Intraoral scanning systems, CAD/CAM technologies, analysisAbstract
The last decades were characterized by rapid progress in the introduction of new digital technologies in the field of prosthetics. The intraoral scanning systems are data acquisition devices which make it possible to make precise prosthetic structures, to identify
carious lesions, orthodontic anomalies. This article analyzes modern trends in the field of newly developed intraoral scanning technologies published in scientific journals in recent years. It summarizes the information provided by various databases: PubMed, ResearchGate, Google Scholar and on the internet sites of manufacturing companies. As a result, a historical review was made with a focus on the development of intraoral scanning systems and their characteristics, advantages and disadvantages were thoroughly discussed.
References
Cicciù M, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C et al. 3D digital impression systems compared with traditional techniques in dentistry: a recent data systematic review. Materials. 2020; 13(8):1982.
Karakas-Stupar I, Zitzmann N, Joda T. A novel reference model for dental scanning system evaluation: analysis of five intraoral scanners. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2022; 14(2): 63-69.
Kravitz ND, Groth C, Jones PE et al. Intraoral digital scanners, Journal of clinical orthodontics. 2014; 48(6):337-347.
Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G et al. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature. BMC oral health.
; 17(1):1-11.
What is an Intraoral Scanner and How Does it Work? https://www.launcadental.com/what-is-an-intraoral-scanner-and-how-does-it-work (accessed 13 November 2022)
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2017; Article ID 8427595.
DIGITAL IMPRESSIONS: VIRTUALLY PERFECT http://www.thedentalarcade.com/blog/digital-impressions-virtually-perfect/ (accessed 20 December 2022)
Gogushev K, Abadjiev M, Valcheva Z. Comparison conventional and digital impression technique in prosthetic dentistry: a literature review. Varna medical forum. 2021; 10(1):162-168. (in Bulgarian).
Punj A, Bompolaki D, Garaicoa, J. Dental impression materials and techniques. Dental Clinics. 2017; 61(4):779-796.
Kulkarni M, Thombare R. Dimensional changes of alginate dental impression materials-An in vitro study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015; 9(8):ZC98.
Aragón M, Pontes L, Bichara L et al. Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. European journal of orthodontics. 2016; 38(4):429-434.
Eto N, Yamazoe J, Tsuji A et al. Development of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm to classify images acquired with
an intraoral scanner of individual molar teeth into three categories. Plos one. 2022; 17(1):e0261870.
Priyanka G, Sujesh M, Kumar R et al. Digital impressions in prosthodontics – Past, present and future trends. IP Ann. Prost Rest Dent. 2022; 6:66-70.
Swapna B, Kamath V. Digital Impressions In Prosthodontics – An Overview. Journal of Critical Reviews. 2020; 7(14):733-735.
Intraoral scanners: Brand comparison, uses, and more https://www.meetdandy.com/articles/intraoral-scanner-comparison-pros-and-cons/ (accessed 20 November 2022)
Patzelt S, Lamprinos C, Stampf S et al. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparative study. J Ame Dental Assoc. 2014; 145(6): 542-551.
Jorquera G, Sampaio C, Bozzalla A et al. Evaluation of trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners and a conventional impression: an in vivo clinical study. Quintessence Int. 2021; 52(10), 904-910.
Róth I, Czigola A, Joós-Kovács G et al. Learning curve of digital intraoral scanning–an in vivo study. BMC oral health. 2020; 20(1), 1-7.
Yang C, Cheng C, Ye S et al. A double blinded trial to compare the patient satisfaction and crown accuracy of two different intraoral scanners for the fabrication of monolithic lithium disilicate single crowns. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2022; In Press.
The benefits of digital dental impressions https://blog.ddslab.com/the-benefits-of-digital-dental-impressions (accessed 27
November 2022)
Gavounelis N, Gogola C, Halazonetis D. The Effect of Scanning Strategy on Intraoral Scanner’s Accuracy. Dentistry Journal 2022; 10(7):123-133.
Manicone P, De Angelis P, Rella E et al. Patient preference and clinical working time between digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022; 128(4):589-596.
Kernen F, Schlager S, Alvarez V et al. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022; 128(6):1303-1309.
Suese K. Progress in digital dentistry: The practical use of intraoral scanners. Dental Materials Journal. 2020; 39(1):52-56.
Tomita Y, Uechi J, Konno M et al. Accuracy of digital models generated by conventional impression/plaster-model methods and intraoral scanning. Dental materials journal. 2018; 37(4):628-633.
Ali A. Accuracy of digital impressions achieved from five different digital impression systems. Dentistry. 2015; 5(5):1.
Vág J, Renne W, Revell G et al. The effect of software updates on the trueness and precision of intraoral scanners.
Quintessence Int. 2021; 52(7):636-44.
Sanda M, Miyoshi K, Baba K. Trueness and precision of digital implant impressions by intraoral scanners: a literature review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2021; 7:1-25.
Revilla-León M, Young K, Sicilia E et al. Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 120:104-114.
Alikhasi M, Alsharbaty M, Moharrami M. Digital implant impression technique accuracy: a systematic review. Implant dentistry. 2017; 26(6):929-935.
Arcuri L, Lorenzi C, Cecchetti F, et al. Full digital workflow for implant-prosthetic rehabilitations: a case report. ORAL & implantology. 2015; 8(4):114.
Mizumoto R, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy Jr et al. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2020; 123(1): 96-104.
Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Sanohkan S. Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners. BioMed Research International. 2021; Article ID 2673040:10 pages.
Dalal A, Rathi S, Dhamande M. Digital Impressions in Dentistry. Journal of research of medical and dental science. 2022;
(7):76-81.
Intraoral Scanner Reviews from IDS 2021 + IOS Market Update https://instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/news/intraoral-scanner-reviews-from-ids-2021-ios-market-update/ (accessed 1 November 2022)
Gutmacher Z., Kelly A., Renne W., et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiple digital impression systems on a fully edentulous maxilla. Quintessence Int. 2021; 52(6):488-495.
Hack G, Patzelt S. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: an in-vitro investigation. ADA Prof Prod Rev.2015; 10(4):1-5.
https://www.3shape.com/ (accessed 13 December 2022)
https://www.dentsplysirona.com/en-us (accessed 1 December 2022)
https://academy.medit.com/courses/meditlink-regular-usersen (accessed 27 December 2022)
https://itero.com/ (accessed 30 November 2022)
https://www.launcadental.com/ (accessed 16 November 2022)
Pavlova V, Pavlov B, Vlahova A et al. Aesthetic prosthetic rehabilitation by digital smile design. Science and Youth Textbook. 2021; 6:290-294.
Damyanova D. Scanner SkyScan Microtomography With Temporary Teeth. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2017; 16,7(VI):92-95.
Rangelov S. Contemporary requirements to fixed interim prosthetic constructions. Problems of dental medicine. 2021; 47(1):13-19.
Hristozova M, Zlatev S, Vlahova A. A fully digital approach in aesthetic rehabilitation, Case report, Oral presentation. Science and Youth Conference MU-Plovdiv. 2021.
Gerdzhikov I. Basic principles and stages of treatment of patients with maxillary resection. Knowledge international journal, scientific papers, medical sciences and health. 2017; 26(4):1301- 1306.
Gerdzhikov I. Combined prosthetic treatment options for patients with hard palate resection. Knowledge international
journal, scientific papers, medical sciences and health. 2017; 26(4):1327- 1330.
Shindjalova R, Prodanova K, Svechtarov V. Modeling Data for Tilted Implants in Grafted with Bio-Oss Maxillary Sinuses
Using Logistic Regression. – AIP Conference Proceedings. 2014; 1631:58-62.
Vlahova A. Preparation junctions for all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown and bridge restorations. Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine. 2016; 20(2):122-125.
Rangelov S. Аdditive digital technologies in contemporary dental medicine, А review, International Interdisciplinary Virtual Meeting “Alumni Club and Friends”. Book of Proceedings. 2021:140-143,
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 M. Dimova-Gabrovska, M. Stamenova, D. Shopova, M. Yankova (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under these terms.
Journal Acta Medica Bulgarica 
