Ovarian carcinoma: the role of protein biomarkers in preoperative differential diagnosis

Authors

  • V. Racheva Clinical Laboratory, University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment "Sveta Marina" – Pleven; Medical University – Pleven Author

Keywords:

transthyretin, transferrin, apolipoprotein A1, β2-microglobulin, CA 125, ovarian carcinoma

Abstract

It is a clinical challenge to identify which women with ovarian tumors are at risk of developing malignancy. The majority of ovarian tumors are benign and can cause problems due to their size, proximity to various organs, and pain or discomfort. The remainder are malignant, and their timely diagnosis is of great importance for improving patient survival. Today, the gold standard for differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors is histopathological biopsy. It is an invasive method and obtaining a result from it requires a long period of time. Preoperative examination of tumor markers, as well as ultrasound features during transvaginal ultrasonography, are often used to distinguish between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. In clinical practice, the serum marker CA125 is a valuable indicator, but is characterized by low specificity – elevated values are also observed in benign conditions such as endometriosis and inflammatory diseases. In recent years, additional biomarkers have been sought that, in combination with CA125, could increase diagnostic accuracy. Among them, the serum proteins transthyretin (prealbumin), transferrin, apolipoprotein A1, and β2-microglobulin deserve attention.

References

Dunton C, Bullock RG, Fritsche H. (2019). Ethnic Disparity in Clinical Performance Between Multivariate Index Assay and CA125 in Detection of Ovarian Malignancy. Future Oncology, 15(26), 3047–3051. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0310

Dochez V, Caillon H, Vaucel E, et al. Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12:28. doi:10.1186/s13048-019-0503-7.

López-Portugués C, et al. Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer: Towards Personalized Diagnostic Panels. Proteomes. 2024;12(1):8. doi:10.3390/proteomes12010008.

Pan C, et al. Circulating proteins and metabolites panel for noninvasive preoperative diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. BMC Med. 2025;23:341. doi:10.1186/s12916-025-04341-2.

Nosov V, et al. Validation of serum biomarkers for detection of early-stage ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(2):478–486. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1180.

Clarke CH, et al. Proteomic biomarkers ApoA1, truncated transthyretin and transferrin enhance sensitivity of CA125 for detection of early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;122(3):548–553. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.002.

Чакалова Г. Опортюнистичен скрининг за овариален карцином- контингенти, методи, съвременни алгоритми. Национално ръководство: Поведение при овариален карцином, МОРЕ 2014;45-50.

Семова Т, Димитров Д, Хинкова Н и др. Първични синхронни тумори на ендометриума и яйчника – едноцентрово ретроспективно проучване. Български медицински журнал, 2024, 18(4), 42-50.

Бочева Я. Предиктивна стойност на някои туморни маркери при проследяване на онкоболни – верифициране с FDG PET/CT. Автореф. на дис. труд за придобиване на ОНС „доктор", МУ – Варна, 2014.

Hussain F, Hassan A, Tunio A, et al. Gynecologic tumor markers. Updated Aug. 2005.

Vasileva M, Gorcheva Z. Using magnetic resonance tomography as an imaging method for pre-operative evaluation of early-stage endometrial cancer. Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Research. 2024 Jun 28;17:143-55.

Alexandrova E, Smal M, Di Rosa D, et al. BRPF1 inhibition reduces migration and invasion of metastatic ovarian cancer cells, representing a potential therapeutic target. Scientific Reports. 2025 Mar 4;15(1):7602.

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2021 May;71(3):209-49.

Holschneider CH, Berek JS. Ovarian cancer: epidemiology, biology, and prognostic factors. InSeminars in surgical oncology 2000 Jul (Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 3-10). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Pepin K, del Carmen M, Brown A, Dizon DS. CA 125 and epithelial ovarian cancer: role in screening, diagnosis, and surveillance. American Journal of Hematology/Oncology®. 2014 Dec 1;10(6).

Algeciras-Schimnich A. Ovarian cancer: a review of current serum markers and their clinical applications. Clinical Laboratory News. 2013.

Zhang Z, Bast Jr RC, Yu Y, et al. Three biomarkers identified from serum proteomic analysis for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer. Cancer research. 2004 Aug 15;64(16):5882-90.

Gadomska H, Grzechocińska B, Janecki J, et al. Serum lipids concentration in women with benign and malignant ovarian tumours. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2005 May 1;120(1):87-90.

Ahmed N, Oliva KT, Barker G, et al. Proteomic tracking of serum protein isoforms as screening biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Proteomics. 2005 Nov;5(17):4625-36.

Shan W, Liu J. Inflammation: a hidden path to breaking the spell of ovarian cancer. Cell Cycle. 2009 Oct 1;8(19):3107-11.

Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow?. The lancet. 2001 Feb 17;357(9255):539-45.

Stefanova D, Stoykov D, Gorcheva Z. Non-invasive screening methods for early detection of colorectal cancer. Surgery. 2025 Jul 16;89(2).

Published

28.04.2026

How to Cite

Ovarian carcinoma: the role of protein biomarkers in preoperative differential diagnosis (V. Racheva , Trans.). (2026). Bulgarian Medical Journal, 20(1), 34-38. https://journals.mu-sofia.bg/index.php/bmj/article/view/797

Similar Articles

1-10 of 11

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.