Advanced surgical and therapeutic trends in the treatment of chronic sacroiliitis in neurosurgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2026-0036Keywords:
sacroiliac joint anatomy and biomechanics, medical treatment, minimally invasive treatmentAbstract
Abstract. The sacroiliac joints are among the largest joints in the human body. They are subjected to heavy loads on a daily basis. The pathology of the sacroiliac joints can be easily missed due to the many common and overlapping symptoms with other diseases in this area. The thin joint capsule, the high mechanical load, and the asymmetrical movement of the pelvic girdle explain the frequent involvement of the sacroiliac joint. Chronic degenerative processes in the joint may result from rheumatic, infectious, drug-dependent and oncological causes. Diseases such as ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthropathy, Bechet’s disease, hyperparathyroidism and various pyogenic causes also cause changes in the joint. Hormonal changes during pregnancy and being overweight are predisposing factors for the development of chronic sacroiliac arthritis. According to the literature, 10-25% of the pain in the area is due to sacroiliac joint pain. Due to the often irradiating pain in different directions, a correct diagnosis is difficult. The therapy of chronic sacroilitis is continuously improving due to the high social importance of this disease. Twenty-eight patients were treated in the Department of Neurosurgery of Pulmed University Hospital with hyaluronic acid injection and corticosteroid blockade, under X-ray control in both sacroiliac joints. Preoperatively, the patients were evaluated using neurological examination and the Oswestry Disability Index, VAS, and “Facial Pain Rating Scale” scales. The results after the minimally invasive methodology showed an excellent response to the pain syndrome. Follow-up of the patients continued up to nine months after the manipulation.
References
Kiapour A, Joukar A, Elgafy H, al. Biomechanics of the Sacroiliac Joint: Anatomy, Function, Biomechanics, Sexual Dimorphism, and Causes of Pain. Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Feb 10;14(Suppl 1):3-13. doi: 10.14444/6077.
Wong M, Sinkler MA, Kiel J. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis, Sacroiliac Joint. 2023 Aug 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan.
Ulas ST, Diekhoff T, Ziegeler K. Sex Disparities of the Sacroiliac Joint: Focus on Joint Anatomy and Imaging Appearance. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 9;13(4):642. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040642.
Xiong Y, Cai M, Xu Y, et al. Joint together: The etiology and pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 17;13:996103. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.996103.
Poilliot AJ, Zwirner J, Doyle T, Hammer N. A Systematic Review of the Normal Sacroiliac Joint Anatomy and Adjacent Tissues for Pain Physicians. Pain Physician. 2019 Jul;22(4):E247-E274.
Prati C, Lequerre T, Le Goff B, et al. Novel insights into the anatomy and histopathology of the sacroiliac joint and correlations with imaging signs of sacroiliitis in case of axial spondyloarthritis. Front Physiol. 2023 May 11;14:1182902. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1182902.
Tonosu J, Oka H, Watanabe K, et al. Characteristics of the spinopelvic parameters of patients with sacroiliac joint pain. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-02184737‑1.
Diekhoff T, Lambert R, Hermann KG. MRI in axial spondyloarthritis: understanding an ‚ASAS-positive MRI‘ and the ASAS classification criteria. Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Sep;51(9):17211730. doi: 10.1007/s00256‑022‑04018‑4.
Jurik AG. Diagnostics of Sacroiliac Joint Differentials to Axial Spondyloarthritis Changes by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 29;12(3):1039. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031039.
Zhang K, Liu C, Zhu Y, et al. Synthetic MRI in the detection and quantitative evaluation of sacroiliac joint lesions in axial spondyloarthritis. Front Immunol. 2022 Sep 26;13:1000314. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1000314.
Cihan ÖF, Karabulut M, Kılınçoğlu V, Yavuz N. The variations and degenerative changes of sacroiliac joints in asymptomatic adults. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2021;80(1):87-96. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2020.0032.
Agrawal P, Tote S, Sapkale B. Diagnosis and Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis. Cureus. 2024 Jan 19;16(1):e52559. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52559.
Patel A, Kumar D, Singh S, et al. Effect of Fluoroscopic Guided Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction. Cureus. 2023 Mar 20;15(3):e36406. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36406.
Jee H, Lee JH, Park KD, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy‑guided sacroiliac joint intra‑articular injections in the noninflammatory sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.021.
Kennedy DJ, Engel A, Kreiner DS, et al. Fluoroscopically Guided Diagnostic and Therapeutic Intra‑Articular Sacroiliac Joint Injections: A Systematic Review. Pain Med. 2015 Aug;16(8):1500-18. doi: 10.1111/pme.12833.
Chamlati R, Connolly B, Laxer R, et al. Image-guided sacroiliac joint corticosteroid injections in children: an 18‑year single‑center retrospective study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020 Jun 17;18(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00435-8.
Aktaş İ, Sarı K, Ünlü Özkan F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion‑guided sacroiliac joint corticosteroid injection in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Aug 22;69(1):116-120. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8858.
Fukui T, Kitamura N, Kurokawa T, et al. Intra-articular administration of hyaluronic acid increases the volume of the hyaline cartilage regenerated in a large osteochondral defect by implantation of a double-network gel. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014 Apr;25(4):1173-82. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-5139-3.
Marinho A, Nunes C, Reis S. Hyaluronic Acid: A Key Ingredient in the Therapy of Inflammation. Biomolecules. 2021 Oct 15;11(10):1518. doi: 10.3390/biom11101518.
Petrey AC, de la Motte CA. Hyaluronan, a crucial regulator of inflammation. Front Immunol. 2014 Mar 11;5:101. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00101.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 K. Bechev, N. Yotova, D. Markov, V. Aleksiev, G. Markov, A. Fasova (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under these terms.
Journal Acta Medica Bulgarica